Goldenarticles articles

Rediscovering the mind - psychology


From the viewpoint of a contemporary microbiologist, we hear the call for integration and conventional sense in sciences that are all too often devising break away stakes and ramparts to hold forth from, on high. The 'experts' thus proving their ignorance since the answer certainly is baseless ego and puffery. Truth did not allocate herself up for prissy 'nerds' to prevail upon, with their colossal convolutions and devious attempts to carry out buffoonery upon her.

In Grand of 1980 Psychology Today ran an commentary by Harold J. Morowitz, professor of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry at Yale University. I advise a accomplish analysis of this clause for anybody who has suffered all through a absolute exposure to all that our avant-garde culture arrangement is comprised of; as it tries to convert you that the whole thing is 'black and white' and that no soul exists all the way through escaping of its command (except a few artists who defy the norm).


Physical scientists are inveterate to the view that belief - denotation mind - is one of nature's basic realities'.

The study of life at all levels, from community to molecular behavior, has in contemporary times relied on reductionism as the chief explanatory concept. This approximate to data tries to comprehend one level of logical phenomena in terms of concepts at a lower and apparently more deep level. . . Reductionism at the psychological level is exemplified by the viewpoint in Carl Sagan's best advertising book THE DRAGONS OF EDEN.

He writes: 'My deep-seated premise about the brain is that its workings- what we at times call 'mind' - are a corollary of its anatomy and, physiology and nobody more. ' As a additional display of this trend of thought, we note that Sagan's lexicon does not be full of the words mind, consciousness, perception, awareness or thought, but moderately deals with entries such as synapse, lobotomy, proteins and electrodes?

Werner Heisenberg, one of the founders of the new physics, became genuinely complex in the issues of attitude and humanism. In PHILOSOPHICAL Tribulations OF QUANTUM PHYSICS, he wrote of physicists having to abandon opinion of an objective time-scale collective to all observers, and of dealings in time and space that are autonomous of our capability to comment them. Heisenberg stressed that the laws of description no longer dealt with elementary particles, but with our acquaintance of these particles - that is, with the 'contents of our minds'. Erwin Schrdinger, the man who formulated the elemental equation of quantum mechanics, wrote an extraordinary hardly book in 1958 called MIND AND MATTER. In this cycle of essays, he moved from the domino effect of the new physics to a fairly numinous view of the universe that he identified with the 'perennial philosophy' of Aldous Huxley. Schrdinger was the first of the quantum theoreticians to communicate sympathy with the UPANISHADS and Eastern philosophical thought. A budding body of journalism now embodies this perspective, plus two common works. THE TAO OF PHYSICS by Fritjof Capra, and THE DANCING WU-LI MASTERS by Gary Zukav. . .

However, the only austere and dependable category physicists were able to assign to a measurement complicated an observer's appropriate aware of the result. Thus the bodily event and the at ease of the human mind were inseparable. This linkage enforced many researchers to badly bear in mind consciousness as an central part of the assembly of physics. Such interpretations moved art en route for the 'idealist' as contracted with the 'realist' conception of philosophy.

The views of a large add up to of contemporary brute scientists are summed up in the essay 'Remarks on the Mind-Body Question' on paper by Nobel laureate Eugene Wigner. Wigner begins by pointing out that most brute scientists have returned to the credit that accepted wisdom - gist the mind - is primary. He goes on to state: 'It was not feasible to devise the laws of quantum procedure in a fully even way devoid of allusion to the consciousness. ' And he concludes by noting how remarkable it is that the methodical study of the world led to the comfortable of consciousness as an basic reality. '. . .

The founders of avant-garde atomic assumption did not start out to be a nuisance a 'mentalist' conjure up on the world. Rather, they began with the contrary point of view and were artificial to the acquaint with day arrangement in order to clarify tentative results. . .

The domino effect of this chain of reasoning will doubtless lend more aid and comfort to Eastern mystics than to neurophysiologists and molecular biologists; nevertheless, the congested loop follows from a clear-cut arrangement of the explanatory processes of acclaimed experts in the three branch out sciences. Since persons seldom work with more than one of these paradigms, the broad-spectrum catch has customary diminutive attention. . .

We now appreciate the difficult facial appearance in a compelling assurance to innocent reductionism as a elucidation to the badly behaved of mind. We have discussed the weaknesses of that position. In addendum to being weak, it is a perilous view, since the way we answer to our fellow human beings is needy on the way we conceptualize them in our hypothetical formulations. If we envisage our fellows exclusively as animals or machines, we drain our interactions of humanistic richness. If we seek our behavioral norms in the study of bodily societies, we disregard those uniquely human skin tone that so much enhance our lives. Radical reductionism offers very hardly in the area of moral imperatives! Further, it presents the wrong word list of terms for a humanistic pursuit. "

The Minnesota Twins study has been on-going for decades and it has bent some remarkable consequences that few information see the bearing of in citation to the very characteristics of 'humanistic richness' and expressive potentialities. Only once is the top researcher permissible to bring up ESP. Much as the Harvard study I have reported, the participants are category members but for the reason that they were separated at birth and (in this case) twins - there is a larger association of ESP or intuitive abilities than normal. Isn't this just conventional sense? Who can doubt it, you might say! Yet most associates think ESP is some weird attribute or freak of description instead than a gift we all have 'within', if they think it exists at all.

The best part of citizens today do not know about Tesla's 'non-force info packets', 'free energy', 'energy from vacuum equipment by Bearden' or what layers of time/space are complex in all intuitive phenomena. Thus those who say they have faith in in ESP are at a loss to describe and they avoid any real involvement with it. The scientists are equally ignorant of these effects and they (after all) are 'experts' like the doctors who deny the mind-body link with the soul that is vital to intuitive utilization. Our award civilization DENIED these truly human and fantastic or discriminating depths of being.

Author of Diverse Druids
World-Mysteries. com guest 'expert'
Columnist for The ES Press Magazine


Recover Your Wellbeing  Psychology Today

A Projection of Treason  Psychology Today

A Mother's Final Gift  Psychology Today

Is Psychology Broken?  Psychology Today

Expressing Our Selves  Psychology Today

Prejudice in the Brain  Psychology Today

Why Psychology Matters  Psychology Today

Psychology's WEIRD Problem  Psychology Today

Developed by:
home | site map © 2020